17
witnesses, said the following about the termination of the Self-Defense and the creation of its successor, the Kartibas Dienests:
(Voitkus dep. 161)
Meiers also alluded to the difference between the two organizations:
(Meiers dep. 2.-222)
The existence of two separate entities explains an apparent conflict in the testimony of two of the respondent's Australian witnesses. Meiers, who worked for the Self-Defense from July 2, 1941 until mid-July said he was not paid (Meiers (dep. 15,163), but Sirants, who worked at Annas Street beginning in late July, was. (Sirants dep. 94) In fact, Sirants said that the money came from German sources and the manner of payment (an allotment to the family and one to a savings account) was modeled on that of the German military. Id.
Examination
Commencing on the prior page, the INS expends considerable effort building its collective guilt case:
- constructing organizational history;
- contending it is therefore "expected" for Hāzners to deny that organizational history because
- it confirms his organizational guilt5
- and the organizational guilt of his associates,
- who are therefore "expected" to lie to exonerate their cohort in war crimes Hāzners;
- thereby confirming Hāzners's personal guilt.
| 1 | Testimony of Verness Voitkus, 2-November-1978, deposition. |
| 2 | Testimony of Janis Meiers, 1-November-1978, deposition. |
| 3 | Testimony of Janis Meiers, 1-November-1978, deposition. |
| 4 | Testimony of Valentins Sirants, 1-November-1978, deposition. |
| 5 | e.g., the INS's repeated allegation that Latvians ran Hitler's concentration camps |
